Trust has figured prominently in the election campaign. Here is a Civitas Online Publication (PDF file) by Peter Briffa that explains why trust in politicians has diminished.
« Crime | Main | The ladder of opportunity »
Trust has figured prominently in the election campaign. Here is a Civitas Online Publication (PDF file) by Peter Briffa that explains why trust in politicians has diminished.
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 26, 2005 4:20 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Crime.
The next post in this blog is The ladder of opportunity.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (5)
When political parties act in their own interests, instead of the people's, they should be brought to book, but they know they can do as they like. Anyone up for a spot of anarchy, that'll show em, as we say in yorkshire.
Posted by peter reddington | December 12, 2006 5:31 PM
Posted on December 12, 2006 17:31
"if a politician does not achieve re-election before the end of their tenure, they should be executed"
Why wait until the end, do it first.
Posted by Peter | May 3, 2005 5:33 PM
Posted on May 3, 2005 17:33
As democracy seems to consist of the counting of heads every four or five years, a system of finding and valuation of what is inside them is long overdue. A simple questionaire to assess the political knowledge of the individual is required and a points system established e.g. a score of ten out of ten gives a voter the equivalent of ten voters who score one out of ten.
Posted by J.E.Briffa | April 28, 2005 2:09 PM
Posted on April 28, 2005 14:09
I WILL be voting but it isn't through any real conviction that the Conservatives or Liberal Democrats will be any better. I'm voting to punish the present incumbent as over the last eight years he has behaved in an arrogant, "I know what is best for you", self serving and bigoted manner in just about every field and area of life.
The next one won't be any better but in 4 or 5 years time I can cane that one too by voting them out.
I wrote about this in my blog under the heading "Enjoying the election" which summarises my feelings about politicians in general and how they view the electorate.
Perhaps the Chinese Empire method of selecting public servants should be re-introduced. Only eunuchs could be appointed to office. THAT should discourage those who want to try their brand of madcap social experimentation against the will of the population. Or perhaps a law to state politicians can only serve a fixed number of terms and if a politician does not achieve re-election before the end of their tenure, they should be executed. That might make them more responsive to the will of the electorate.
But of course this will have to be voted in by the politicians and thus will never happen.
Posted by Philb | April 27, 2005 1:21 PM
Posted on April 27, 2005 13:21
Excellent article. I regret to say I agree with the vast majority of what Peter has to say. Nanny State has us and too many of us love Nanny.
Posted by David Vance | April 26, 2005 8:43 PM
Posted on April 26, 2005 20:43