« Why the British Should Not Stop Getting Their Niqabs in a Twist | Main | The wrong building blocks »

Who Will Only Have Eyes For You on Xmas Day?

In an intriguing twist to the story about Channel Four’s plan to make over its alternative Christmas Day message to a niqab-wearing Islamic Studies lecturer from Leicester, today’s Times reports the lady in question appears to have had second thoughts about appearing in the slot, claiming she hadn’t been told it was designed for broadcast at the same time as, and in competition with, the Queen’s Christmas Day message.

Channel Four is reported as not being at all concerned that the lady in question, Ms Khaija Ravat, might pull out, insisting it will go ahead with the broadcast anyway.

Could it be that, if Ms Ravat should not turn up for the recording of the message, all Channel Four need do is garb someone else in a niqab and no one would be any the wiser a substitution had been made!

Better still, should Ms Ravat pull out, Channel Four could employ a singer to do the slot and ask her to sing that time-honoured classic ‘I only have eyes for you’!

How silly of me to think Channel Four might do that. It would risk offending Muslims, whereas diss’ing the Queen by broadcasting a rival alternative Christmas Day message to hers, and ridiculing Christmas by giving over the slot to a niqab-wearing Muslim, apparently matters not one iota.

Comments (1)

Doug Over:

I think Channel 4's sponsor would have more to do with this than Channel 4 would admit to. Jjust think about it: Would you want to spend many thousands on advertising only to realise that no one might be viewing the programme?

Post a comment

Because we are deluged by spam all commenters need to provide an email address. Comments may also need to be approved, but we try to be as quick as we can.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 8, 2006 10:08 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Why the British Should Not Stop Getting Their Niqabs in a Twist.

The next post in this blog is The wrong building blocks.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33