« A Night at the Operating Theatre … or At Least Somewhere too Close to One for Anything Other than Acute Discomfort | Main | Gypsies and Legal Equality »
March 18, 2005
Political correction: poisoning the Ivy League
The tragedy in The Human Stain, Philip Roth’s great chronicle of America during the Clinton impeachment, is detonated by an innocuous question: ‘Do they exist or are they spooks?’ Coleman Silk, an eminent professor at New England's small Athena College, asks it about two absent students. The students turn out to be black, and lodge a bogus charge of racism exploited by his enemies. Silk is disgraced. His life begins to unravel. Like all good novels it frictionlessly combines fiction and reality to make important points about the state we’re in.
Roth’s narrative blasts at full throttle through the idiocies and injustices of political correctness, and this is particularly relevant given that in the unmargined world a different faction of the political correctness lobby is hounding another dean out of office. In January, Harvard’s president Larry Summers suggested there might be biological reasons which contribute to the low proportion of female professors in the sciences. Mr Summers, a brilliant economist, had previously been criticised for his managerial style and now the schadenfreude of his enemies has become unmistakable. The debate has been rehearsed here before but it has now reached a new level, as Camilla Cavendish observes in her trenchant column in yesterday’s Times.
Summers’ position has now been rendered all but untenable by a no confidence vote of 218-185 by members of the faculty of arts and science. Although Harvard Students for Larry rejected the vote, saying that this ‘demonstrates a complete rejection of the major tenets of academic freedom’, their anger about such censorship is unlikely likely to sway the myopic academics. It is incredible that he might lose his job for saying what he did. Then again, as Roth said of the difficulty facing novelists in the modern age, reality is constantly outstripping even our wildest imaginations.
Posted by Nick Seddon at March 18, 2005 09:14 AM
Comments
Then again, perhaps the Governors (or whatever they're called at Harvard) could decide that all 215 are guilty of gross moral turpitude and sack 'em. They could then replace them by people who understand ideas like academic freedom, freedom of speech and enquiry, and that sort of thing. Of course, they might have to look across the Atlantic to find people who fill the bill.
Posted by: dearieme at March 22, 2005 12:12 PM
Should be: Political Correction, not Correctness.
Pure Communism.
Posted by: Michael Hearne at June 12, 2005 04:45 AM
The point with Political Correctness is that it is to control ones thoughts and attitudes. The idea is to streamline everone into an ideal future by promoting and persecuting certain views. To this end education is the Watchword even if it usually is propaganda. One academic who traces PC back to Lenin is Dr.Frank Ellis of the Russian Department at the University of Leeds, UK.
I have started a petition in support of Dr.Ellis's acedemic rights at -
http://petitionthem.com/default.asp?sect=detail&pet=2626
Would you be so kind as to circulate the web link
amongst your friends and contacts to sign and
support him in this Inquisition?
Posted by: David Hamilton at May 25, 2006 02:10 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(Because we are bombarded by huge amounts of spam, if you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site moderator before your comment will appear. Thank you very much for waiting.)