« Promoting Civil Society EU-Style | Main | Crime »
April 21, 2005
There is No Reassurance in Knowing One is Not Alone
On March 17th, I wrote a blog relating the unsettling experiences my wife (and, to a much lesser extent, I too) had had at the A & E department of our local NHS hospital after an ambulance brought her there (with me in attendance) in the middle of the night following a bad fall she had suffered after fainting.
After waiting almost four hours before being seen by a doctor, my wife was told she would have to be moved to what the nurse who told her this conceded to be an inappropriate ward, prior to undergoing further necessary tests.
Upon pressing to know why since A& E was practically empty at the time, I was informed this was not because A & E needed her bed but to meet a government target that all patients admitted to A&E be either admitted to a ward or discharged within four hours.
It was, therefore, with a sigh of recognition but little pleasure that I read in today’s Daily Telegraph that a study conducted by researchers at Sheffield University of more than 400,000 patients who had similarly been admitted to A & E departments found that as many as ‘one in eight patients is moved out of emergency departments in the 20 minutes before the four-hour deadline expires.’
The study was conducted by Dr Susanne Mason, a clinical senior lecturer in emergency admission. She is quoted as having said: “ We found that with patients admitted and discharged there is a sudden leap in the number dealt with …[in] the last 20 minutes before the target is missed and suggests that these patients are being moved out of the department at the last minute in order to ensure that the targets are met.”
Lest anyone wonder whether the apparent last-minute flurry of activity by A& E staff gives genuine cause for concern, the Daily Telegraph notes that ‘it is increasingly being claimed that patients are being admitted to wards inappropriately as a result’.
The newspaper report ends quoting Dr Mason saying of her study that it ‘certainly raises a number of questions about how time targets contribute to the quality of patient care’,
As a coda to this statement of Dr Mason’s, I cannot forebear mentioning what I overheard said by the duty-doctor at the very same A & E department of my local hospital last Friday afternoon, after my GP had instructed me to take myself there for an ECG after I had 'phoned her earlier that day to express concern about persistent chest pains from which I had been suffering in the context of a family history of heart disease. It was too late for me to go to outpatients of the cardiology department which had already closed for the week-end!
As I was sitting in A & E waiting to receive my ECG, I heard the duty-doctor say of the fellow-patient sitting next to me to a nurse whilst gesturing anxiously to a clock on the wall, “Hurry up! He’s got to be out of here in 15 minutes".
The fellow patient of mine of whom this was remarked was a young African man whose manifest discomfort at the time was so acute as to enable the doctor to make this remark without fear of his hearing it.
I could not help overhear the same doctor subsequently tell the same young man that what he was suffering from that was causing his pain was a blood-clot in his lower right leg. The patient was told he would need reassessment of his condition after a three-day course of treatment consisting of anti-coagulant tablets plus daily injections at the hospital, plus pain-killers.
The patient was offered the choice of being admitted to hospital or coming in each day as an out-patient to receive the injections, which latter course was what the doctor recommended since, as he told the young man, “You are a fit young man and have no need to stay here”.
The young man was, to me at least, in no fit condition to do anything other than do as the doctor suggested, and so dutifully submitted to his first injection. Because he found the injection unpleasant – administered in his stomach, as he sat there next to me! -- he turned to me for what little comfort and reassurance I could give him.
Afterwards, just as he had started his slow and painful exit from the A & E department, I could not resist asking him in light of what I had overheard was ailing him whether he had recently been on a flight.
“Oh yes”, he said to me in a tone of incredulity suggesting he had not been asked that question by anyone there or even knew its significance. “Six days ago, I came here from Africa on an eight hour flight.”
As I said, there is little solace to be gained from knowing that one is not alone in receiving short-shrift by A & E.
As to the pains in my chest, after establishing to their satisfaction I had not suffered a heart-attack, A & E sent me on my way, saying it was probably just anxiety but that I should see my GP again.
My GP said I should see a cardiologist immediately, which I duly did, privately and at my own expense. Apart from his informing the A& E were in breach of protocol, he informed me blood tests reveal I have worringly high cholesterol and must come back and see him tomorrow.
Next installment of my health saga to follow soon... I sincerely hope!!!
Posted by David Conway at April 21, 2005 12:02 PM
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(Because we are bombarded by huge amounts of spam, if you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site moderator before your comment will appear. Thank you very much for waiting.)