« Is this Guv a Fair Cop? | Main | The right to be rude »
January 30, 2006
Constructing social change
Last week, news of Scotland’s unprecedented rise in lone parenthood – since 1997 the figure has risen from 140,000 to 174,000 - re-awoke issues around the relationship between policy and behaviour. Whilst Scotland’s record rise in single parents outstrips the UK’s by 7% (24% compared to 17%), Office for National Statistics figures show that under New Labour the number of lone parents in the UK has risen from 1.6 million to 1.88 million.
The Prime Minister’s response to the rise coincided with the publication of the Welfare Green Paper. With lone parents disproportionately likely to be out of work and claiming benefits, Blair made it clear that one implication of the Green Paper will be to put greater pressure on lone parents to enter employment. Furthermore, Blair's comments on the issue suggested that he is finally acknowledging that it is the organisation of his very own welfare system which has contributed to this dependency. However, what he has yet to acknowledge is the fact that current welfare arrangements are not only encouraging lone-parent dependency, they arguably also encourage lone-parenthood per se – at the very least in the sense that they provide perverse financial incentives for parents to leave their partners, and in that they in no way support or promote the couple family. Not just spokesmen from the Catholic Church, who argue that there is ‘an inbuilt bias against marriage’ but also the Liberal Democrats, directly blame the benefit system on the rising number of lone parents. Work and Pensions spokesman David Laws pointed to the fact that the current system presents a financial ‘disincentive’ for lone parents to re-partner.
Yet despite the evidence - particularly that from our overseas counterparts - the government continues to insist that the rise in the number of lone parents is simply a factor of that ethereal scapegoat ‘social change’.
Posted by Anastasia de Waal at January 30, 2006 02:33 PM
Comments
Just over a decade ago leading Conservatives were derided when they suggested that some teenage girls became pregnant in order to jump council house waiting lists. This is now a truth universally acknowledged outside Islington (a borough curiously unaware of the 'chav' culture gripping the rest of Britain).
How long will it be, I wonder, before recent studies in the US that indicate that it is welfarism and not institutional racism that is chiefly responsible for poverty and criminality amongst African-Americans are similarly accepted (and the implications for certain ethnic minorities and lower socio-economic groups here)?
Perhaps an African-American woman in the White House might be the catalyst in this process?
Posted by: Joseph at February 1, 2006 12:36 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(Because we are bombarded by huge amounts of spam, if you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site moderator before your comment will appear. Thank you very much for waiting.)