« 'Your Money, Your Life or Join My Gang': World War Three Declared Without Note or Comment From HMG or MSM | Main | Carry on polluting... »
May 15, 2006
Slowly Light is Dawning in the Dim Region Formed By the Combined Intellects of This Government
Signs are starting to appear that the government is finally beginning to realise just how badly it misjudged policy in connection with diversity and social cohesion.
How cool it all seemed back in the early days of the first Blair administration, when the door of Number Ten was opened to the glitterati who had endorsed the return of New Labour, to swallow on behalf of the country hook, line and sinker every provision in the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as to set about fostering social inclusion and cohesion by the aggressive promotion of multiculturalism.
Several tube-bombings later -- plus the recent revelations that a thousand plus foreign criminals convicted and imprisoned for serious offences have been released into the community rather than made to leave, so as to obviate their needing to claim asylum to avoid deportation and thereby embarrass the government, plus recent surveys that reveal dangerously high levels of alienation among young British-born Muslims combined with the recent revelations about how that alienation might be being actively fomented by Muslim colleges they are attending on British university validated degree programmes -- have all combined to prompt the government to reconsider some of its previous policies in these adjacent areas.
It was reported in yesterday's Observer and confirmed on BBC Radio 4's Today programme this morning that the Government is considering amending the 1988 Human Rights Act so as to restore to the courts and the Home Secretary power to deport convicted foreign criminals, upon completing their sentences, without their being able to avoid deportation by claiming asylum.
Today, it was also announced that the government s to reconsider citizenship education in schools, as well as how Islam may be taught at degree level to British Muslims. In the case of both reviews, the aim is to ensure both forms of education promote rather than impede social cohesion.
These are promising signs of sanity dawning at last among the senior ranks of the government.
But it may all be too little and too late.
It may be too little in that their attempt at educational reform will not succeed in its objective unless the government really appreciates just how much needs to be changed in terms of what is taught, in schools and in Muslim schools and colleges in particular, to ensure that all British citizens growing up here do so with sufficient knowledge of this country and its history to give them the wherewithal to appreciate just what a free and tolerant society it is and has been comparatively speaking for a very long time, and hence what a privilege they and their families have, in many cases, in having been granted citizenship here, and how much the world owes generally to British achievement.
It may be too late in that the rot has now gone so deep and become so pervasive it may be too late to restore the traditions and political culture needed to sustain a religiously and ethnically plural society such as ours that is at the same time both tolerant, mutually respectful and above all united in a common national identity with which not only are they all at ease but which they rejoice in having.
Basically, the Crick agenda of active citizenship needs replacing by the older model that sought only good and politically literate and well-informed citizen and that had long fallen into desuetude under pressure from multiculturalism before the Crick one came along to fill the vacuum. The older model of citizenship education demands only political literacy from pupils, so to be able to exercise the vote responsibly, not the manic activism that lies at the heart of Crick’s ideal. The older model also requires something with which Crick’s model is ultimately incompatible: namely, sufficient understanding and appreciation of the institutions of this country and of the history by which it came to acquire them as would almost certainly foster love of country and allegiance to it in all those who had undergone such a form of schooling.
The best way , or at least one very good way, to restore the kind and style of history teaching that would achieve what the government is seeking to bring back to the class-room would be for Henrietta Elizabeth Marshall’s Our Island Story , along with other works of a similar kind, to become part of the core of what is taught in history in primary schools, if not to become the back-bone of the history curriculum in primary school and during the early years of secondary school.
The naïve and innocent phase of the present government’s time in office was symbolised by the exhibition in the Millennium Dome to celebrate that occasion which managed to expunge all reference to British historical achievements for the supposed sake of greater inclusiveness.
It is a sign of its belated coming of age that it has begun to recognise the importance of conveying to British school-children and university students some understanding of Britain’s historical achievements and of how it came to lead the world in the development of liberal and tolerant institutions so that they begin to make that island’s story their own, rather than writing a new chapter for it in which all its great historical achievement is destroyed through deconstruction, of both the intellectual and of the more incendiary kind.
Posted by David Conway at May 15, 2006 01:49 PM
Comments
I've often thought that a book that ought to be written is a young person's guide to English liberty. Too many people in this country don't understand what it is to be free.
Posted by: Bishop Hill at May 15, 2006 08:00 PM
Mr Rammell's decision to launch an investigation into the way Islamic Studies is taught to degree level is both welcome and interesting.
A few years ago I applied to the Open University for a history postgraduate course prospectus. I was utterly dismayed with what I received. Content and methodology were indistinguishable from a media studies degree.
I decided to do a little research and discovered to my horror that virtually all university humanities and social science disciplines were infected with the 'critical theory' contagions. A gentle letter to the then Minister for Higher Education that 'deconstructed this discourse' elicited the terse response that '...under their Charters Universities are independent of government and are therefore free to determine course content and methodology...'
Free, that is, until the Minister (and the UGC, SRC, SSRC etc) start sniffing around...
Posted by: Joseph at May 15, 2006 10:03 PM
On one hand I agree completely that the values, traditions and pride about Britain and all that it stands for, its achievements and impact for good need to be more widely disseminated and not silenced with politically correct nonsense.
On the other hand, my hair is standing on end at the thought of an "Official" government authorised curriculum. The politically correct attitudes that have brought the situation about are so intrinsically part of the thought processes of those wishing to promote this idea that a highly sanitised and edited version will be taught.
Besides, can you name ANY project that this present administration has turned its best efforts towards (Crime, the NHS, immigration, education etc. etc) that hasn't turned to dross?
Dear God PLEASE let them leave the subject alone!
Posted by: PhilB at May 16, 2006 07:46 AM
I suppose that 'Our Island Story' will then be available in the multitude of languages that reside in this country as well...
It's all very well for the curriculum to be re-arranged and polished up but the doctrine preached to the children at home by family members and sermons preached at Mosques are not going to have the same vein of British nostalgia attached.
It would also benefit many British children to get lessons in Orientalism at school, so as to learn the hardships of their Eastern classmates.
Posted by: Andrew at May 18, 2006 10:44 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(Because we are bombarded by huge amounts of spam, if you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site moderator before your comment will appear. Thank you very much for waiting.)