The US National Crime Victimization Survey questions individuals aged 12 or over, whereas the British Crime Survey only questions individuals aged 16 or over. Is this important? In 2000 60.1% of children aged 12-15 in the USA were victims of crime compared with 49.4% of those aged 20-24. Young people aged 12-15 faced the second highest rate of victimization, exceeded only by those aged 16-19 (64.3%). Despite their continued exclusion from the BCS, it is possible to estimate the number of crimes involved.

When comparing the BCS and recorded crime the following adjustments were made by the Home Office in 2002/03 to allow for the exclusion of under 16s. The calculations are contained in a separate document obtainable from the Home Office, 'Comparing BCS and police counts of crime'. The Home Office assumed that 11% of woundings were against under 16s, and reduced the recorded crime total by 31,956. Robbery was reduced by 21%, or 22,248 offences. Theft from the person was reduced by 7% or 10,613 offences. And assault was reduced by 20% or 54,801 offences. In total 119,618 recorded crimes were carried out against under 16s, but excluded for the purpose of comparison with the BCS figures.

We can get a little closer to the true figure by using BCS estimates of the crimes not reported to the police and, if reported, not recorded. The Home Office has produced a 'best estimate' of the proportion of crimes recorded by the police.

Source: Crime in England and Wales 2002/2003, Table 2.01.

In other words, when the Government claims that the BCS provides the most reliable picture of crime, it is missing out 600,730 offences against children under 16. It is also missing out offences against shops, offices and manufacturers. How many crimes against these victims are excluded?

We can make similar calculations to those for the under 16s. The Home Office estimated that in 2002/03, 50% of vandalism (which includes arson and criminal damage to buildings) was against commercial premises, that is 546,666 offences. Similarly 11% of thefts from motor vehicles, were against commercial victims, 64,640 offences; 8% of thefts of motor vehicles, 19,855 offences; 8% of attempted thefts of motor vehicles, 6,843 offences; 11% of attempted thefts from motor vehicles, 11,437 offences; and 6% of vehicle interference and tampering, 6,043 offences. Altogether this produces a total of 655,484 recorded offences, excluded for the purpose of comparison with the British Crime Survey.

Source: Crime in England and Wales 2002/03, Table 2.01.

These figures make no allowance for theft from commercial premises. In The Economic and Social Costs of Crime, published by the Home Office in 2000, the authors estimated the real number of thefts from shops by multiplying the number of recorded offences by 100. Why did they choose 100? The figure was based on a study by Professor Farrington of Cambridge University who has estimated that the multiplier should be between 100 and 1,000. The Home Office opted for the lowest figure in the range, 100, which produced an estimate of nearly 31 million instances of shoplifting. The report acknowledges that this figure may be on the low aside and suggests another formula, also based on the work of Professor Farrington. He has estimated that for every criminal cautioned for or convicted of shoplifting, about 150 offences have actually been carried out. The Home Office further assumes that each offender in the official figures has been convicted for two acts of shoplifting. In 1998 120,000 individuals were cautioned for or convicted of theft from a shop. Using the Farrington formula the Home Office estimated that the total number of offences was 36 million. (The calculation is 120,000 x 2 x 150 = 36 million. See p. 16, note 17 of The Economic and Social Costs of Crime.)

Professor Farrington's estimate is based on a detailed study of shoplifting, but to multiply recorded crime by 100 may strike many observers as rather arbitrary. Another indicator that could be used is the Commercial Victimisation Survey (CVS) carried out by the Home Office in 1994 to discover crime in 1993. The survey found 6,932,000 thefts by retailers' customers or unknown persons (but not counting employees or 'outsiders') in 1993. In that year only 275,607 acts of shoplifting were recorded by the police. If that ratio of recorded crime to actual crime is used, then the multiplier would be 25.2. In 2001/02 306,308 thefts from shops were recorded by the police. If multiplied by 25.2 the total is 7,718,962.

This means that the amount of shoplifting not counted by the BCS in 2002/02 was somewhere between 7.7 million and 31 million, depending on which Home Office report is preferred.

On the most cautious of assumptions, there were 600,730 offences against people under 16 and, on similarly cautious assumptions, there were 2,758,054 offences against commercial victims, not including shoplifting. If shoplifting is included, based on the CVS and again making only the most cautious of assumptions, another 7,718,962 should be added, producing a grand total of 11,077,746 offences. That is, still leaving out many offences recorded by the police (including drug offences and sexual offences), we should add 11.1 million offences to the 12.3 million reported by the BCS for 2002/03, a total of 23.4 million.

Note: Civitas wishes to record its thanks to the Home Office for checking and confirming the accuracy of the comparisons between the BCS and recorded crime in 2001/02. The same method was used by Civitas to calculate the 2002/03 figures, but they have not been checked by the Home Office.

Thanks are due to Jonathan Morris and Nadia Martin for research assistance.