Civitas Civitas
Civitas Home Page About Civitas Author Search How to Purchase What's New Online Catalogue Online Catalogue

Background Briefing


DO THE OFFICIAL CRIME FIGURES TELL THE FULL STORY?

David G. Green

2003/04: Crimes Omitted from the British Crime Survey

Crimes with child victims

When comparing the BCS and recorded crime the following adjustments were made by the Home Office in 2003/04 to allow for the exclusion of under 16s. The calculations are contained in a separate document obtainable from the Home Office, 'Comparing BCS and police counts of crime'. The Home Office assumed that 12% of woundings were against under 16s, and reduced the recorded crime total by 47,581. Robbery was reduced by 19%, or 18,191 offences. Theft from the person was reduced by 7% or 10,083 offences. And assault was reduced by 21% or 55,766 offences. In total 131,621 recorded crimes were carried out against under 16s, but excluded for the purpose of comparison with the BCS figures.

We can get a little closer to the true figure by using BCS estimates of the crimes not reported to the police and, if reported, not recorded. The Home Office has produced a 'best estimate' of the proportion of crimes recorded by the police.


Best Estimate of Crimes Against Victims aged 11-15,
excluded from the BCS


Home Office estimate of recorded crimes with victims aged 11-15 Best estimate of % of real crimes recorded by the police Best estimate of actual crimes against victims aged 11-15
Woundings 47,581 29% 164,072
Robbery 18,191 27% 67,374
Theft from the person 10,083 22% 45,831
Assault 55,766 20% 278,830
Total 131,621 556,107

Source: Crime in England and Wales 2003/2004, Table 3.01.


In other words, when the Government claims that the BCS provides the most reliable picture of crime, it is missing out 556,107 offences against children under 16. It is also missing out offences against shops, offices and manufacturers. How many crimes against these victims are excluded?


Crimes against shops and offices

We can make similar calculations to those for the under 16s. The Home Office estimated that in 2003/04, 50% of vandalism (which includes arson and criminal damage to buildings) was against commercial premises, that is 573,761 offences. Similarly 11% of thefts from motor vehicles, were against commercial victims, 59,992 offences; 8% of thefts of motor vehicles, 17,072 offences; 8% of attempted thefts of motor vehicles, 6,349 offences; 11% of attempted thefts from motor vehicles, 10,656 offences; and 6% of vehicle interference and tampering, 5,669 offences. Altogether this produces a total of 673,499 recorded offences, excluded for the purpose of comparison with the British Crime Survey.


Best Estimate of Crimes Against Commercial Victims,
Excluded from the BCS


Home Office estimate of recorded crimes against commercial victims Best estimate of % of real crimes recorded by the police Best estimate of actual crimes against commercial victims
Vandalism 573,761 23% 2,494,613
Theft from motor vehicle 59,992 36% 166,644
Theft of motor vehicles 17,072 86% 19,851
Attempted theft of motor vehicle 6,349 46% 13,802
Attempted theft from motor vehicle 10,656 46% 23,165
Vehicle interference and tampering 5,669 46% 12,324
Total 673,499 2,730,399

Source: Crime in England and Wales 2003/04, Table 3.01.

These figures make no allowance for theft from commercial premises. In The Economic and Social Costs of Crime, published by the Home Office in 2000, the authors estimated the real number of thefts from shops by multiplying the number of recorded offences by 100. Why did they choose 100? The figure was based on a study by Professor Farrington of Cambridge University who has estimated that the multiplier should be between 100 and 1,000. The Home Office opted for the lowest figure in the range, 100, which produced an estimate of nearly 31 million instances of shoplifting. The report acknowledges that this figure may be on the low side and suggests another formula, also based on the work of Professor Farrington. He has estimated that for every criminal cautioned for or convicted of shoplifting, about 150 offences have actually been carried out. The Home Office further assumes that each offender in the official figures has been convicted for two acts of shoplifting. In 1998 120,000 individuals were cautioned for or convicted of theft from a shop. Using the Farrington formula the Home Office estimated that the total number of offences was 36 million. (The calculation is 120,000 x 2 x 150 = 36 million. See p. 16, note 17 of The Economic and Social Costs of Crime.)

Professor Farrington's estimate is based on a detailed study of shoplifting, but to multiply recorded crime by 100 may strike many observers as rather arbitrary. Another indicator that could be used is the Commercial Victimisation Survey (CVS) carried out by the Home Office in 1994 to discover crime in 1993. The survey found 6,932,000 thefts by retailers' customers or unknown persons (but not counting employees or 'outsiders') in 1993. In that year only 275,607 acts of shoplifting were recorded by the police. If that ratio of recorded crime to actual crime is used, then the multiplier would be 25.2. In 2003/04 301,796 thefts from shops were recorded by the police. If multiplied by 25.2 the total is 7,605,259.

This means that the amount of shoplifting not counted by the BCS in 2003/04 was somewhere between 7.6 million and 31 million, depending on which Home Office report is preferred.

On the most cautious of assumptions, there were 556,107 offences against people under 16 and, on similarly cautious assumptions, there were 2,730,399 offences against commercial victims, not including shoplifting. If shoplifting is included, based on the CVS and again making only the most cautious of assumptions, another 7,605,259 should be added, producing a grand total of 10,891,765 offences. That is, still leaving out many offences recorded by the police (including drug offences and sexual offences), we should add 10.9 million offences to the 11.7 million reported by the BCS for 2003/04, a total of 22.6 million.


Note: Civitas wishes to record its thanks to the Home Office for checking and confirming the accuracy of the comparisons between the BCS and recorded crime in 2001/02. The same method was used by Civitas to calculate the 2002/03 and 2003/04 figures, but they have not been checked by the Home Office.

Thanks are due to Jonathan Morris, Ben Cackett and Nadia Martin for research assistance.

Civitas: the Institute for the Study of Civil Society