+44 (0)20 7799 6677

Arguments against the European Union

A PDF of this resource can be accessed here.


Opponents of the European Union, most commonly described as Euro-sceptics, include those who are critical of certain areas of EU policy, believe their own country should leave, or believe the EU should be disbanded. Their views generally relate to the broad themes outlined below. These are opinions – you should decide if you agree with them or not.

The EU does not safeguard peace in Europe

Attributing the peace in Europe today to the EU does not take into account the Allied victory over the Axis powers in 1945, and the creation of NATO in 1949. National sovereignty is perfectly compatible with free trade and friendly co-operation in a Europe of self-governing liberal democracies.

The EU is too expensive and doesn’t work

For wealthy countries, such as the UK, the cost of being a member of the EU is greater than the benefits they receive. The best estimates put the annual net cost to the UK of EU membership at approximately £31 billion gross. Much of this money pays for the outdated and wasteful Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), while a sizeable amount goes towards the Structural Funds which transfer money to poorer areas of the EU.

The costs of EU membership could be holding back faster developing countries, particularly the UK, which has a more global economy than many member states. For seven out of the last ten years, EU GDP growth has been lower than that of the USA, being almost half of that of the US in 2010. This is largely the effect of EU regulation making it less easy to do business. In 2006, the EU’s Enterprise and Industry Commissioner, Günter Verheugen, estimated the cost of EU regulation to be €600 billion per annum. This is the equivalent of the EU losing the entire output of a medium-sized country like the Netherlands every year!

The situation becomes more concerning when one considers how hard it is to reform the way that the EU spends money. Several attempts to reform the CAP have failed to reduce its cost substantially, while the 2005 budget negotiations also failed to agree to a slimmed-down budget. This is because it is almost impossible to reach an agreement between 27 countries. At present, EU leaders are hoping to negotiate a reform for the next budget cycle, starting in 2013.

The EU is too powerful

The European Community was set up as an economic organisation. However it has expanded its role to cover many areas where it would be better for member states to make decisions. This process has been accelerated since the Maastricht Treaty (1992), which expanded EU power into new areas. Its powers now extend into traditionally national policy areas with the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and Justice and Home Affairs Policy (JHA). Many EU policies affect ordinary Europeans in the form of EU regulations that attempt to impose a single standard across the EU, but which are never debated by national parliaments.

The EU is undemocratic

The European Union has a lot of power but is much less accountable to the people than national governments. Most EU decisions are made or shaped by the EU Commission which is led by unelected Commissioners and run by an appointed bureaucracy. The democratic element of the EU model – the European Parliament – has fewer powers than a national legislature and rarely influences EU decisions. Turnout at European Parliament elections is so low that it is difficult to proclaim its legitimacy. The other key decision-making body – the European Council – is secretive, often meeting behind closed doors to thrash out deals. All of this demonstrates contempt for democracy and a reluctance to engage with voters.

The EU undermines the nation state

Many of the things that the EU does are based on the principle of supranationalism. In order for this to work, member states have to agree (normally through signing a treaty) to hand over sovereignty to the EU. Certain areas, such as defence, taxation or currency should not be handed over to a supranational body because to do so would undermine the nation state. Nevertheless, many have been. Sadly, the EU is not as effective at managing many policy areas as nation states have been. The arguments within the eurozone provide an example of the difficulties caused by handing over sovereignty. The EU often ends up reaching a compromise that no-one finds satisfactory because it always has to try to please all of its members.


The problems are getting more complicated. For each European country it is more complicated than before to find convergence with any other.” – Hubert Vedrine, French Foreign Minister 1997-2002.

Recent votes in the real world suggest the peoples of Europe have lost confidence in this project.” – Nigel Farage, UK Independence Party Leader, 2005.

Creating a single European State bound by one constitution is the decisive task of our time.” – Joschka Fischer, German Foreign Minister 1998-2005.

Technical Terms

Gross Domestic Product: the value of goods produced within a country.

Supranationalism: a form of organisation through which decisions are made by international institutions, not by individual states.

Eurozone: the nickname commonly used to describe the 16 member states that use the Euro.

External Links

UK Independence Party website

The Bruges Group website


Keep up-to-date with all of our latest publications

Sign Up