- Centralised EU power
- Granted the EU a legal personality
- Created a President and single Foreign policy post
- New powers for the European Parliament
- Extended ECJ powers into Home Affairs
- Made the Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR) legally binding
- New powers to harmonise national legal systems
Voting System
When membership of the EU rose to 27 nation states, it became impractical that the majority of decisions were made through unanimity. New methods of decision-making were needed, and the Lisbon Treaty changed voting in the Council of Ministers so that more decisions are now made by Qualified Majority Voting (QMV), rather than using unanimous voting. Decisions made through QMV must be approved by a 'double majority' - 55% EU member (15 states), representing at least 65% of the EU's population. This compromise on voting weights was reached in response to Poland's strong opposition to the original proposals. Also, all decisions made using QMV are now subject to the co-decision procedure, so that Parliament and the Council of the EU must both vote. Majority voting was extended into over 40 new areas, controversially including certain external affairs, however Britain has opt-outs in the areas of justice and home affairs. The new voting system will be implemented from 2014.
Theoretically the EU now functions with greater efficiency, by passing legislation more easily. However the ability for individual nation states to prevent contentious legislation being passed and implemented has been reduced. It has been calculated that the extension of QMV cut Britain's ability to prevent legislation that it opposes from being passed by 30%.
Presidential and Foreign Policy Posts
The Lisbon Treaty created the two new posts suggested in the original TCE. It created a permanent President of the European Council with a mandate of two and a half years, and states that the occupant can't be a current 'head of state'. The first President, Belgium's Herman Van Rompuy, was appointed in December 2009. There are fears that this President of the European Council could eventually be merged with the President of the Commission, creating a very powerful position.
The treaty also created a single foreign policy post, entitled the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, which is currently Britain's Baroness Catherine Ashton. She conducts foreign policy on behalf of the European Council, such as representing all member states at the UN.
The High Representative for Foreign Affairs automatically gains membership to the European Commission, but does not have the power to independently generate policy. The treaty abandoned the failed constitution's the contentious use of the term 'Foreign Minister', in addition to symbols such as the flag and a national anthem that implied a supranational state.
Legal Personality
Under the Litbon Treaty, the CFHR was given full legal status and accepted by most member states as legally binding, although the UK and Poland have been granted 'opt-outs' from its implications.
It is argued that the inclusion of the CFHR helps develop the concept of EU citizenship. The UK in particular has its own legal traditions that might be undermined by the CFHR under the Lisbon Treaty, notably its Common Law system that differs from the Civil Law systems found across Europe.
Structural changes and new powers
The ECJ's scope for activity was extended into new areas, allowing it full jurisdiction over justice and home affairs for the first time. However, the UK secured its ability to opt-out on police cooperation and the option to opt-in on legislation relating to judicial issues, although it has been suggested any opt-outs could be undermined through the extended jurisdiction of the ECJ.
The European Parliament has more rights under the Lisbon treaty, placing it level with the European Council regarding legislation and allowing it to elect the President of the Commission.
The Lisbon Treaty had intended to reduce the size of the Commission so that only two-thirds of EU members (18 states) would be represented by a Commissioner at any one time from 2014. However, negotiations following Ireland's rejection of the Treaty in 2008 confirmed that all member states will keep their Commissioner unless National Leaders vote unanimously to not have one Commissioner per state.
Countries lost the right to veto over policy in social security, foreign policy, trade, space policy, terrorism prevention, energy, transport and the definition of crimes and sentences, and police forces are now able to enter any EU country to tackle cross-border crime without having to gain permission first.
Arguments
For
- The Lisbon Treaty clarified the power of the EU and the role of the nation state.
- Extending the use of QMV made the voting system fairer for all members and decision-making more democratic.
- The Treaty safeguards citizens' fundamental rights.
- The EU is more likely to pass legislation, even with twenty-seven or more members.
- With the permanent EU Presidency, individual nation states are less able to pursue specific interests as the leadership is acting in the interests of EU, giving focus and direction.
Against
- It gave the unelected EU Commission greater say over foreign and home affairs. This challenges the principle that sovereign states should have control over these important policy areas.
- The UK is now not able to use its veto to block future changes in an increasing number of areas, potentially even those in which it had negotiated an opt-out.
- The treaty made the EU an international actor in its own right, separate from, and superior to, its Member States. It turned what was an international agreement into something more like a single state.
- Changes did not address the EU's democratic deficit - the Commission remains answerable solely to the European Council and not directly to any EU citizens, as does the new President.
- The ECJ gained jurisdiction in a range of areas, including the power to dictate the fundamental rights of all EU citizens, with precedence over long-established national institutions.
Facts and Figures
- The original Treaty for a Constitution in Europe was seven hundred and eighty-four pages long and written in complex, technical legal language.
- 18 nations ratified the TEC before it was rejected by two electorates, terminating the ratification process.
- Under the Lisbon Treaty, the President has a significant power base, consisting of 3,500 civil servants in the Council Secretariat.
- Ireland rejected the Lisbon Treaty in a referendum in June 2008 with a majority of 53.4%.
Quotes
"What you cannot do is have a situation where you get a rejection of the treaty and bring it back with a few amendments and say, 'Have another go'. You cannot do that" - Tony Blair, British Prime Minister. Quoted in The Independent (23 April 2004)
"The fundamentals of the Constitution have been maintained in large part" Angela Merkel, German Chancellor. Quoted in El Pais (25 June 2007)
"There is no constitutional change that would justify holding a referendum" - Peter Mandelson, European Trade Commissioner. Quoted in the Telegraph (2nd July 2007)
"A few million Irish cannot decide on behalf of 495 million Europeans." - Wolfgang Schaueble, German Interior Minister, Deutsche Welle (15th June 2008)
"The Treaty is not dead. The Treaty is alive, and we will try to work to find a solution." - Jose Manuel Barroso, European Commission President, Press Conference (14th June 2008)
Technical Terms
Legal Personality: The power to allow the EU to make international agreements by itself, on behalf of member states.
Unanimity: The need for all member states to agree on a proposal before it can be adopted as legislation.
Veto: The right of one country to block a proposal.
Ratification: the process by which member states' parliaments confirm their country's acceptance of a treaty.
Intergovernmental Conference (IGC): the formal procedure for debating and deciding amendments to the EU's founding treaties.
Qualified Majority Voting (QMV): 'double majority' voting system whereby 55% EU Council members (15 states), representing at least 65% of the EU's population must vote in favour of a proposal for it to pass. Votes are spread in relation to the size of a country.
Opt-out: The ability to decline from signing an agreement, against a presumption to do so.
Opt-in: The ability to sign-up to an agreement, against a presumption not to do so.