Archive for May, 2007
Independence rules! Or does it?
Posted by James Gubb in Health on 31/05/2007
Having an independent NHS seems to be the big idea at the moment. Cameron is all for it, Brown is pondering it and Andy Burnham, the likely successor to the embattled Ms. Hewitt, is apparently sympathetic. As are a number of influential bodies. Steve Dewar, Director of Health Policy at the King’s Fund, re-ignited the debate in 2003 with his paper ‘Government & the new NHS – Time for a new relationship?’; Fiona Godlee, editor of the BMJ has been a long-term supporter; the Health Services Management Centre at Birmingham University, including Chris Ham, argued for it in their paper ‘Things can only get better?’ (April 2007); the BMA followed suit this month in ‘A Rational Way Forward for the NHS’; and today the Nuffield Trust released a pamphlet by Prof. Brian Edwards reviewing the various forms independence could take.
The Independent police sector
Posted by Nick Cowen in Crime on 30/05/2007
When the government fails to fulfill its minimal responsibilities, it is the poor that will suffer while the rich can usually find an alternative. In a typical case in the UK, for years, even as average fees have been rising, the number of families seeking out independent education has been growing steadily. There it is because a minimal amount of discipline and teaching has not been available in many areas of state education for some time.
Now, (via BOM), we learn that a far more basic government service, protection from crime, has fallen to such a level that the richer streets of North London, Primrose Hill in particular, are beginning to invest in independent security forces. Pity the other inhabitants of Camden who cannot afford to opt out of state police protection.
Further Thoughts On a Citizenship Curriculum for Young British Muslims
Posted by Nick Cowen in Social Cohesion on 29/05/2007
A recent article in the International Herald Tribune provides its readers with some not entirely reassuring details about how young British Muslim students at their country’s burgeoning madrassas are being taught citizenship in them.
Continued on the Centre for Social Cohesion blog.
Polls, politics…and education
Posted by David Conway in Education on 25/05/2007
The Conservatives u-turn on grammar schools has dominated this week’s education news. That there was rebellion in the Tory ranks was not surprising, grammar schools being a pinnacle of previous Conservative education policy. What was surprising, however, was the fact that the rebellion struck only now. Cameron, Willets and Osborne have all said that grammar schools will not feature on the new Conservative agenda. Yes, this week Willets attempted to dismantle the entire pro-grammar schools case, arguing that grammars did the opposite of what many conservatives believe: arrest, rather than increase social mobility. Nevertheless, it has been quite clear from the day that Cameron slid into his commanding saddle – or rather since his bid for the saddle – that the new leaders of the Tory party are not interested in Conservative ideology. Nor are they pursuing a new ideology: the Conservatives’ route to power is a haphazard one, directed by polls rather than principles. A political strategy that might be dubbed the pursuit of All Ways in contrast to New Labour’s Third Way. The problem, and the cause of in-fighting, is that the Conservative backbenchers are torn. On most days, party members want to get into power no matter what; yet on the days that the pillars of their core beliefs are whipped out from under their feet…well, their feet get suddenly chilled.
The hubris of ‘Fair trade’, the risks of immigration
Posted by Nick Cowen in Immigration on 23/05/2007
This morning, Radio 4’s Today programme aired a shocking report on the poor treatment of employees (mostly Polish immigrants) in a banana packing factory. Workers had to accept long hours or face being unemployed. Their breaks would be cancelled if the managers felt they had not packed enough boxes. In the most extreme example, a pregnant woman with a doctor’s note was refused a less labour intensive job and, as a consequence, miscarried. Ironically, the bananas these workers park are marked ‘fair trade’ in many major supermarkets.
The first problem this highlights is the continuing difficulty of the fair trade brand. The complex journey that products embark on, from the raw resource to the processed goods on the shop shelves tend to involve a great many different types of workers in many different environments. Fair trade goods have frequently come under fire for having only one or two stages in the production process be conducted ‘fairly’ and yet still be officially sanctioned as fair trade. The other problem is that farmers and traders in the Third World become behoven to an unwieldy bureaucracy to ensure they receive a ‘fair price’ for their goods when, in fact, many of these workers could flourish with simple free trade under the right political conditions.
It seems that this issue has become even more fraught now that unfettered immigration is allowing working conditions to disintegrate in some sectors of the economy. The problem is a combination of newly arrived immigrants who are very willing to work intensively for long hours (an admirable quality in itself) and unscrupulous recruitment agencies whose tactics blur the line between ‘robust’ employment practices and defrauding workers who are not yet aware of their rights and duties in British society. This is the dark side of all those claims that immigrants are the main drive in growing British GDP (claims that remain highly disputable). No one can deny that immigrants can to contribute keeping down the price of ‘fair trade’ bananas to ease consumers’ consciences that bit more cheaply. But at what cost to the wages and working condition of unskilled employment in the UK?
Moore Balls Recycled
Posted by Pete Quentin in European Union on 22/05/2007
The weekend papers had a number of contributions focused on the EU and the increasingly resurgent issue of its proposed Constitution. Charles Moore spent his Saturday wrestling with the trials of recycling (in his Telegraph article at least), as imagined up by both the architects of the new Landfill Directive and those of that soon-to-be-recycled Constitution. He did a thorough job of detailing the various means by which it will further strip sovereignty from member states without even consulting their electorates. The article can be found here.
A day later it was the turn of Ed Balls, writing in the Sunday Times, to do his own piece on recycling – denouncing the ‘outdated and sterile’ arguments of ‘anti-Europeans’. While he may have called for a ‘reframing of the British debate’, it seems he was less keen on reframing than on grasping an opportunity to repaint the EU-sceptics as misguidedly, and dangerously, nationalist.