<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Ofsted Be Placed Under ‘Special Measures’?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.civitas.org.uk/wordpress/2009/03/24/should-ofsted-be-placed-under-%e2%80%98special-measures%e2%80%99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.civitas.org.uk/wordpress/2009/03/24/should-ofsted-be-placed-under-%e2%80%98special-measures%e2%80%99/</link>
	<description>Daily commentary from Civitas researchers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:39:34 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Knott</title>
		<link>http://www.civitas.org.uk/wordpress/2009/03/24/should-ofsted-be-placed-under-%e2%80%98special-measures%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Knott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.civitas.org.uk/wordpress/?p=828#comment-798</guid>
		<description>OFSTED&#039;s not there to back up teachers who are bullied and abused or to stand up for conscientious pupils who cannot learn because of politicised behaviour policies (see http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/julie_henry/blog/2009/03/24/teacher_who_exposed_illdiscipline_should_be_thanked_not_banned).  It is there to promote political correctness.  Like the GTC it is a sharade of DCSF lookalikes.  It ignores what teachers think and paints rosy pictures of schools which fail their pupils.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OFSTED&#8217;s not there to back up teachers who are bullied and abused or to stand up for conscientious pupils who cannot learn because of politicised behaviour policies (see <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/julie_henry/blog/2009/03/24/teacher_who_exposed_illdiscipline_should_be_thanked_not_banned)" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/julie_henry/blog/2009/03/24/teacher_who_exposed_illdiscipline_should_be_thanked_not_banned)</a>.  It is there to promote political correctness.  Like the GTC it is a sharade of DCSF lookalikes.  It ignores what teachers think and paints rosy pictures of schools which fail their pupils.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.civitas.org.uk/wordpress/2009/03/24/should-ofsted-be-placed-under-%e2%80%98special-measures%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.civitas.org.uk/wordpress/?p=828#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Quite so. These goons are more interested in imposing a political orthodoxy than in honest educational assessment. So they blunder through their box-ticking exercise, gaily contradicting themselves, scarcely deigning to look in on the classroom and accepting soviet-style over-documentation (which they themselves have imposed) at face value. 

Then they serve up an indignant, misleading and perhaps libellous conclusion congenial to their own prejudices and those of their governmental masters. I have seen Ofsted at first hand on a number of occasions and rarely have I been impressed. They are an active part of that conspiracy which promotes school as a form of entertainment at the expense of hard, genuine learning. Out with conjugated verbs and times tables, in with &quot;role play&quot; and &quot;projects&quot;. Out, alas, with fluency in foreign tongues or the ability to add without a calculator.

When studies from respectable establishments such as Durham university point out the decline in standards, we are fed the line that once pupils were &quot;taught to pass exams&quot; as though that skill were somehow separable from skill in the examined subject. The other tack is calling universities &quot;elitist&quot; - as if they should be anything else!

In Ofsted we see an important brick in Labour&#039;s pyramid of lies. They can&#039;t close the grammars by ballot so they try to merge or inspect or otherwise squeeze them out of existence. Post that prize berk, Macpherson, the mere hint of &quot;racism&quot; (or an &quot;inadequate response&quot; to the mere idea of such a thing) is enough to shut an excellent school.

I sincerely hope that one day the various corruptions, gerrymanderings, misleading leaks, reannouncements, false accusations and dark hints in which the modern left specialises are brought home to their authors. These people, wherever and whoever they are, belong in gaol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite so. These goons are more interested in imposing a political orthodoxy than in honest educational assessment. So they blunder through their box-ticking exercise, gaily contradicting themselves, scarcely deigning to look in on the classroom and accepting soviet-style over-documentation (which they themselves have imposed) at face value. </p>
<p>Then they serve up an indignant, misleading and perhaps libellous conclusion congenial to their own prejudices and those of their governmental masters. I have seen Ofsted at first hand on a number of occasions and rarely have I been impressed. They are an active part of that conspiracy which promotes school as a form of entertainment at the expense of hard, genuine learning. Out with conjugated verbs and times tables, in with &#8220;role play&#8221; and &#8220;projects&#8221;. Out, alas, with fluency in foreign tongues or the ability to add without a calculator.</p>
<p>When studies from respectable establishments such as Durham university point out the decline in standards, we are fed the line that once pupils were &#8220;taught to pass exams&#8221; as though that skill were somehow separable from skill in the examined subject. The other tack is calling universities &#8220;elitist&#8221; &#8211; as if they should be anything else!</p>
<p>In Ofsted we see an important brick in Labour&#8217;s pyramid of lies. They can&#8217;t close the grammars by ballot so they try to merge or inspect or otherwise squeeze them out of existence. Post that prize berk, Macpherson, the mere hint of &#8220;racism&#8221; (or an &#8220;inadequate response&#8221; to the mere idea of such a thing) is enough to shut an excellent school.</p>
<p>I sincerely hope that one day the various corruptions, gerrymanderings, misleading leaks, reannouncements, false accusations and dark hints in which the modern left specialises are brought home to their authors. These people, wherever and whoever they are, belong in gaol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian josephs</title>
		<link>http://www.civitas.org.uk/wordpress/2009/03/24/should-ofsted-be-placed-under-%e2%80%98special-measures%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>ian josephs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.civitas.org.uk/wordpress/?p=828#comment-790</guid>
		<description>If the exam results are good and the children seem happy then the school must be good !
That is my report without even seeing the school ; I feel absolutely certain however that my brief summary bears more resemblance to reality than the long and jargon laden report produced by Ofsted !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the exam results are good and the children seem happy then the school must be good !<br />
That is my report without even seeing the school ; I feel absolutely certain however that my brief summary bears more resemblance to reality than the long and jargon laden report produced by Ofsted !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

