Ultimately, wherever practicable, freedom should reside with people to select their beliefs, their forms of expression and their associations.

So, in this case, it is the imposition placed on the school and its community, by the State, which is the act of coercion.

Moreover, with no evidence to my mind that multiculturalism actually achieves positive benefits, it is the Law-makers who are the only ones acting on only the basis of personal prejudices – by forcing their agenda of ignorance on to others.

Racism accusations are the modern ducking-stool: The only plea acknowledged is “guilty”, otherwise one is damned as “ignorant” of the sin. So, I fear this article has looked deeply and honestly for a sense of reason and rightness that was never any intention of such policies anyway.

It makes more sense if we follow different observations – the dynamics behind the propagation of the leftist agenda – the very unholy alliance of those who feel envy borne of inadequacy – and those who achieve personal gain from being virtuous protectors and champions of noble sentiments “like equality”. It is here we see man at his weakest thus his most spiteful: The grasping, miserable pursuit of what belongs to others, be that influence, identity, resources or plain happiness: It is why we see myths and bullying; destruction of dissenters; an insistence on telling others what they are thinking and believing.

To argue someone may have contravened such laws is therefore only usually pertinent because it is an admission of such sentiments by the personally-motivated accuser or their flaccid, frightened foot-soldiers: This case fits the bill.

Most people are in favour of Race Relations, equal opportunity, freedom of belief et al. This is why the vindictive, corrupt Law, in the name of such tenets, is such an anathema.