Archive for May, 2010

Another one bites the dust

Just how many punches constitute one punch too many, asks Annaliese Briggs?

Read the rest of this entry »

No Comments

Is this the right climate for change?

A new climate change initiative is the cause of the latest rift in EU politics, writes Natalie Hamill. An EU Commission proposal that the target for the reduction of EU-wide carbon emissions should be increased from 20% to 30% (from 1990 levels) has been met with indignation by Germany, France and big business lobby groups, but is being trumpeted as “the right move at the right time” by the EU Commission and green groups.

Read the rest of this entry »

2 Comments

Academies must reveal all – and now – to prove success

2000 more Academies are to be opened, the coalition government has announced. It’s now even more important to ensure that they’re genuinely effective – and bringing them immediately under FOI is imperative to doing so.

Read the rest of this entry »

2 Comments

Degrees of value

A short article in the Telegraph last week was of a gravity unmatched by its modest coverage, writes Zenobe Reade.  It told of Oxford University’s plans to create a fund to pay the tuition fees of graduates who go on to careers such as teaching and social work. Graduates would apply to have their fees paid by the fund, made up of donations by alumni.

Read the rest of this entry »

1 Comment

Freedom. Fairness. Responsibility. And the NHS.

Freedom.  Fairness. Responsibility.  The sounding words of the coalition document, released today.  But do these words (most particularly the last one) not, then, require at least a mention in the section on the NHS of the scale of the productivity challenge facing the health service… and perhaps a few ideas of what to do about it?

Read the rest of this entry »

, , ,

No Comments

Musical chairs

Most of us mere mortals were sound asleep when the slightly sordid ménage a trois of sorts we were presented with on Friday quickly transformed into a happy, blossoming marriage between two men who appear to have been separated at birth.

Read the rest of this entry »

No Comments